Page 1 of 2

NL Newsletter

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:14 pm
by ivox3
Nice work w/that. This is the first one , ...right ? ...or maybe I've just been in the dark.

At any rate, ... pretty cool. ;)

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:19 pm
by Fernando Tella
Looks nice.

That "Skill up" section is a great idea.

:)

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:25 pm
by aitraaz
Yep, very nice, i was hoping for a few adult personal ads, but i guess they'll put that in next time... :)

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:30 pm
by glypticmax
You guys got a newsletter?
With words and everything?
Cool. I look forward to seeing it.

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:19 pm
by Leonardo
somebody post it, e-mail it or do something!! I want to see it too :shock:

Maya must hate me :oops:

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:38 pm
by Fernando Tella
In fact I have just received it again.

It's online too: http://www.nextlimit.com/newsletter/oct ... etter.html

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:13 pm
by Rochr
"The Maxwell Render 64 bits version for Windows will get most out of the new hardware and provide users with more memory to create higher resolution images and better textures."

They mean to tell us that we need a 64-bit system to create anything larger than a A3?
Are they for real???

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:24 pm
by big K
Rochr wrote:"The Maxwell Render 64 bits version for Windows will get most out of the new hardware and provide users with more memory to create higher resolution images and better textures."

They mean to tell us that we need a 64-bit system to create anything larger than a A3?
Are they for real???
???
are you serious ? i don´t get it.
some people are really hard to be pleased.
what do you want them to do ? a statement like this:

"Er... sorry, we just devoloped the 64bit version of maxwell.
not that you need it. it doesn´t do anything and you don´t have any advantages with it. it is just for running on those stupid 64bit OS versions who haven´t got any advantages as well.
what ? the 32bit version could be already used on those... well, then all this was for nothing.
never mind !"

sorry for being sarcastic. but your post didn´t give me a choice.

michael

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:29 pm
by big K
just to let you know that you are not alone in this world:

some people who might be a little excited to get a 64bit version

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:31 pm
by Rochr
I´m not arguing about a 64-bit system, only that you need one to render out highres, something that should´ve been possible already.

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:44 pm
by big K
so how would you advertise it if you had just develeoped one ?
i think memory usage was one of the advantages of 64bit. wasn´t it?

i really do not get your point, sorry

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:46 pm
by glypticmax
Fernando Tella wrote:In fact I have just received it again.

It's online too: http://www.nextlimit.com/newsletter/oct ... etter.html
Hi Fernando,
I think they sent you my copy. I didn't get one yet.
Thanks for posting the link.
64 Bit sounds very exciting to me. I'm ready and waiting.

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:58 pm
by Rochr
big K wrote:so how would you advertise it if you had just develeoped one ?
i think memory usage was one of the advantages of 64bit. wasn´t it?

i really do not get your point, sorry
My point is that you should already be able to render out highres with a 32-bit system.
I don´t mind a 64-bit system, it allows for more complex scenes and far more objects , but it shouldn´t have to be necessary only to render out something larger than A3-size.

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:19 pm
by b-kandor
Hi Rochr, sorry I don't understand your complaint either. If the -hd option worked properly in 1.1 would you not be saying this? Also, at what resolution do you need to render for A3 or >?

Kandor

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:19 pm
by ludenhud
Could someone forward this mail to ludenhud@hotmail.com please?

Thanks in advanced