Page 1 of 1
redqueen vs. Maxwell ... No Cigar!
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:07 pm
by markps
This is RedQueen's website.. but it seems that their main page is a Maxwell vs. Redqueen comparisson
On the second test we can see how maxwell is way better on the light distribution. Redqueen isn't there yet.
http://www.bee-www.com/
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:07 pm
by ludi
what's the translation of "Himatsubushi"..........
*roflmao*
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:19 am
by Hybaj
Indigo has faster clearing transparent materials, Maxwell has a more natural light distribution, Winosi has much better caustics and probably the colors too, Hungrycat has better "hard to beleive faster rendering and a very hard to beleive chance of implementing of the even harder to beleive delta sampling"....
now who's going to fuse these renderers into one superb renderer (with displacement.. why the hell none of these pathracers have displacement) ??
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:34 am
by markps
Ok.. you can't beat maxwell on image quality at this moment. Maxwell has a shinny thing (you might call it light distribution) that seems more real than other renders..
but it is an endless race... And it is very healthy to make comparisons so we can understand better the features we already have or want to have