Maybe Will, ... but even within the many variables of life, ..there's a general 'evening out' or basic pattern that develops. The initial formula is based on a an individual who posesses average/above average CG skills, ..within 5 years of experience and already has begun building a client base , but hasn't established consistancy concerning invoicing.
The part you think might have a contradiction in it actually contains the original idea. Remember, ...there was a variable for multiplying what you need times the what the market will take.
Example, .. There's a neural surgeon, ...he's in the top 3 in the world at what he does. He performs brain surgery. What's he worth? How does he figure what to charge? If he used my forumula to determine that amount, ..well, ..the part of living costs becomes quite negligible because his ability to raise his multiplication factor is so great. He could easily charge $80,000.00/hour or more for his knowledge. He's nearly impossible to replace, ..what if the other 2 guys are busy? You see my point. I'm just saying that people who are peforming CG work should cover their costs and then some, ...if their skillset warrants it, ..then that price can go up accordingly. So, ..back to the contradiction, ...if your the only game in town for high end CG particle simulations, ... your not easily replaced and your price reflects that. That is all.
Fran: ..nice example, ... I remember one. ...
