Maxwell Render | Official public forum

Posted: **Fri Jun 24, 2005 1:23 pm**

Can you post a scene with the problem?

Posted: **Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:00 pm**

Are you using any block instances ?

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 5:59 pm**

heyix01 (Ralf),

Can't see your images bit, I understand what you mean, I think (and this is likely a wishlist item).

When adjusting the basic properties you would like Rhinoll to automatically interpret it as a Plastic shader or so. Right ?
Also, how do you think Rhinoll should interpret the transparency option ?
(There is a Rhinoll equivalent for the other settings but not for transparency... should it be ignored ?)

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 8:22 pm**

A bump without bump parameter is not so good, I would like if the transparency slider control the bump - 100 % = 1000 MW.

Posted: **Mon Jun 27, 2005 9:44 pm**

Micha wrote:A bump without bump parameter is not so good, I would like if the transparency slider control the bump - 100 % = 1000 MW.

Somehow, that doesn't sound right

(A transparency slider that controls bump ? ... not too ergonomic

)

Posted: **Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:05 pm**

Thomas An. wrote:
Micha wrote:A bump without bump parameter is not so good, I would like if the transparency slider control the bump - 100 % = 1000 MW.
Somehow, that doesn't sound right
(A transparency slider that controls bump ? ... not too ergonomic )

This is true, but a transparency button makes no sense for metals. So, we can only disable it or?

Maxwell Render | Official public forum

Rhino Material is not submitted to MW