Maxwell Render | Official public forum

Posted: **Fri Jun 17, 2005 7:37 pm**

This was an SSS test that "failed"

Posted: **Fri Jun 17, 2005 7:55 pm**

ginosso wrote: high quality as usual... Thomas

but is SSS for achieve trasparency inside the objects or is for have better surfaces...? it's a little dark for me at moment the meaning of this parameter

but how do you have model it ?

I was hopping to get some SSS in the fingers ans ears (the thinner parts) ... but ... I screwed up somewhere in the settings

Right now it is all opeque.

The model is free:
http://graphics.stanford.edu/data/3Dscanrep/

Posted: **Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:21 pm**

I was gonna say I dont see any sss there. It still looks good though. The test I have run so far have been buggy to say the least. It was using an old file though. I am going to start on a new scene and let you all know how it goes. Nice work as always Thomas.

Posted: **Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:25 pm**

Very nice. I`d like to see one with more SSS

Posted: **Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:28 pm**

Great Thomas.

Posted: **Fri Jun 17, 2005 9:12 pm**

Very good lighting, great. How do you get it so sharp? Is it downscaled?

Posted: **Fri Jun 17, 2005 9:28 pm**

Micha wrote:Very good lighting, great. How do you get it so sharp? Is it downscaled?

Micha,

There is no post process at all, and yes it is downsized.

Here is the original size:

Posted: **Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:18 pm**

Also not so bad as I have thought. Wonderful noisefree. How long did it render?

I would set the focus to eyes of the monster. Is it a mistake or a problem of the Rhino plugin?

Posted: **Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:22 pm**

Micha wrote:Also not so bad as I have thought. Wonderful noisefree. How long did it render?

I would set the focus to eyes of the monster. Is it a mistake or a problem of the Rhino plugin?

It took 3.5 hours to render.

The focus is a mistake (good catch). Right now it is focusing at the base.

Posted: **Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:26 pm**

Or you say, it is a new kind of realism, like a quick shot with an autofocus camera.

Posted: **Sat Jun 18, 2005 6:52 pm**

hi Thomas An.

how come your picture has no noise? what's the sampling Number? it doesn't look like environment is set up sky. does the different light affect noise?

Posted: **Sat Jun 18, 2005 6:59 pm**

dudrjs79 wrote:hi Thomas An.

how come your picture has no noise? what's the sampling Number? it doesn't look like environment is set up sky. does the different light affect noise?

Its a pure product shot.
No skydome
No physical sky.

Sampling level (I think) was 12

Posted: **Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:27 am**

very clean result thomas! great!

Posted: **Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:30 pm**

Second try.

Posted: **Sun Jun 19, 2005 6:18 pm**

Jack094 wrote:Hi Thomas

What software did you use to convert the PLY files found at the Stanford Uni site to 3dm?

cheers

Jack

Its the ply importer by Jeff Lasor

Import_ply.rhp

Maxwell Render | Official public forum

First try with the new beta

First try with the new beta

Re: converting PLY to 3dm