Add here your best high-quality Maxwell images.
User avatar
By f64cg
#331673
Hello All,

We've updated our website and gallery.
All renders were via MW 1.7 or 2 using Rhino as our primary modeling platform.

Here's a taste....

Image

Image
Last edited by f64cg on Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By tom
#331680
Clearcoats could be less reflective but well, very nice model and render!
User avatar
By Thomas An.
#331686
Approved. No contest.
The engine image made my legs weak.
User avatar
By ivox3
#331711
Impressive impressive.

I gotta know ..

1. system ram ?
2. model size ?
3. is the other side of the engine cut away ?
User avatar
By macray
#331720
great pictures, but the triangulated wires on your website spoil the presentation.
Especially seeing the wires that dense when it is not necessary...
User avatar
By f64cg
#331728
Thanks for the comments everyone!

@ivox3 ....

1) Our workstations are setup with Core i7 Extreme Edition 965/12GB RAM/Quadro FX4800
Our primary rendernode is setup with Dual Xeon X5570s and 24GB RAM
2) The engine's .mxs is 4GB (the Rhino file is right around 2GB)
3) Its a complete engine with manufacturing tolerances. The inside components aren't complete yet...we're getting there.

Most of our clients need high resolution images as a final product. As a general rule, all our models/renders must hold up at 4000+ pixels.

We've done a 8000 pixel render of the engine for a mural print that went 47 in x 47 in (~1200mmx1200mm).
User avatar
By ivox3
#331733
Thx for the reply & stats.

2 GB Rhino file. Yikes. Rhino 5, yeah ? I'm thinking it would have to be.

Looks great.

after a lot of years doing arch-viz... almost 20 a[…]

render engines and Maxwell

Funny, I think, that when I check CG sites they ar[…]

Hey, I guess maxwell is not going to be updates a[…]

Help with swimming pool water

Hi Choo Chee. Thanks for posting. I have used re[…]